Skip to content
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Quora

Ex Gratia Law Journal

Research. Write. Publish

  • Home
  • Aim
  • Disclaimer
  • We are
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Board
    • Blawg Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Marketing and Outreach Team
    • Planning and Development Team
  • Journal
    • Volume 1
      • Vol 1 Issue 1
      • Vol 1 Issue 2
      • Vol 1 Issue 3 (Special Issue)
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2 Issue 1
      • Volume 2 Issue 2
      • Volume 2 Issue 3
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3 Issue 1
  • BLawG
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Covid and Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Competition Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Children and Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Human Rights
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
    • International Law
      • Laws of Other Countries
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Labour Law
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Taxation
    • Sports Law
    • Technology and Law
  • Author Area
    • Submit Article
    • Submit BLawG
    • Certificates
  • Upcoming Events
  • Careers & Opportunities
    • Content Writers
    • Campus Ambassador
    • YouTube Video Editors
    • Poster Designer
    • Research Internship
    • Website Update Team
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • BLawG
  • Covid and Law
  • China’s Imputability for the Pandemic
  • Covid and Law

China’s Imputability for the Pandemic

The aim of this blog is to delve into the pandemic COVID-19 which has already claimed 345,000 lives. Due to the biological strand of the virus, it is fast spreading and has hardly been brought under control. All of this pain and misery traces its origin to China. In this blog, we would look into how China deliberately tried to spread the life-threating virus- starting from the bio-lab in Wuhan to the blocking of the discussion in the UN. We would also deal with the various international conventions and treaties that are being disregarded by China. Suggestions of ways through which justice could be sought against China's actions in the International forum have also been mentioned.
Mansi Sethiya Jain and Jahnavi S. October 17, 2020

Let others know this too

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
Covid 23

INTRODUCTION

The outburst of coronavirus has resulted in more than 5.43 million confirmed cases along with 345,000 deaths around the globe. As of May 25, 2020 there are about 139,000 confirmed cases in India. By far this is the largest infectious disease outburst in the history of mankind and all of this maps down its origin to China. China despite being the country with the largest population has less than 90,000 cases and has managed to recover almost 94% of its corona affected population. This without a doubt raises a question, if this disease was an act of god or a well planned and executed strategy?

CHINA DELIBERATELY TRIED TO SPREAD THE LIFE-THREATENING VIRUS?

Questions raised on the Bio-Lab at Wuhan-

China’s tweet on the Jan 7, 2018 discussed about a bio-safety lab in Wuhan, which was experimenting with highly pathogenic microorganisms, and the very next year corona virus, a pathogenic microorganism found in Chinese bats wreaked havoc worldwide.[1] This virus was named as the Sars-CoV-2. Though there is no concrete proof to pin the blame on this Bio-lab, inferences and circumstances as pointed out below do raise fundamental doubts.

It is to be noted that the Sars-CoV-1 outbreak in 2002-2004 was traced to Horseshoe bats found only in Yunnan province of China.[2] Scholars have stated that it is unlikely that these horseshoe bats resulting in ‘Sars’ type viruses could have travelled 600 miles from Yunnan to COVID-19 originator Wuhan and thus, the virus could have only spread from the Wuhan lab that housed 605 bats in its vicinity.[3] This in itself perturbs our mind but the fact that this report by Chinese Scholars was immediately censored by their Govt. gives a glimpse of the doubt.

Further, only Wuhan was substantially affected by COVID-19 despite there being 75 trains to Beijing and 220,000 passengers travelling via metro every day from Wuhan to other parts of China; this raises questions of China using the virus for a Bio-War with the world. If China has indeed done so, it has disregarded the Geneva Protocol, 1925[4]and BTWC, 1925[5], both of which stress on prohibition on Bacteriological forms of warfare. To boot, The Right to Life of persons is being violated by overlooking Art.3 of UDHR, 1948[6] and Art.6 of ICCPR, 1972[7]

The strengthening accusations due to Logical disparity in China’s blame on the Italian military for the spread of the COVID-19

Are you looking for this?  Retrenchment and Laying Off Employees During Pandemic

China in reply to all accusations for creating the virus stated that the participation of the Italian military in Military World Games, 2019 conducted in Wuhan was the cause of the spread of the pandemic. There is logical disparity in such submission.

The Games were conducted from 18th-27th October, 2019 but the disease of unknown ethology was detected only by 31st Dec. The incubation period for the novel corona virus is 2-14 days. Yet symptoms emerged in Wuhan nearly 2 months after the games proving the fact that Italian military could have had nothing to do with it. It is an anomaly that China accused Italy for the spread of the virus yet just a month later organized ‘Hug a Chinese’ initiative in Italy.  Had China acted responsibly? The spread of the virus could have been cut by 95%. Thus, this raises substantial doubt whether China’s accusations on Italy are a mere garb of shielding its own wrongful actions?

China blocked discussion about the pandemic in the UN

History is witness to the fact that countries have vetoed motions in the UN to protect their own selfish interests. Be it vetoing a motion to allow entry of Mongolia into the UN or shielding the Syrian government during the Syrian Civil War, China has done it all. The veto of a discussion on the pandemic raises questions about China’s efforts to shield itself from being internationally liable for giving wrong information and being non-cooperative with the WHO.

VIOLATION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

The jurisdiction for taking China to court lies in Art.75 of the WHO Constitution, 1946. The only prerequisite for it is to undergo a negotiation as stated in Art.56. According to the decision in Ukraine v. Russia[8], State would only need to satisfy the negotiation condition in order to sue any country before the Court; it would not need to go through the World Health Assembly. Thus, any country has the jurisdiction to sue China at the ICJ.

The violations under the WHO Constitution include Arts.63 and 64 which states that, a State is required to communicate to WHO all reports pertaining to health published in the State. China failed to provide data about the number of infected persons, which is important in determining the contagiousness. Art.37 emphasises that the Director General and staff should not be influenced but the Director General who won the elections with China’s backing is praising China despite its violations and this clearly hints towards ‘influence’. When there is evidence on record that China has failed to share data with WHO, the shielding of China by the Director General of the body raises reasonable doubts over the ulterior motive of both the WHO and China.

Are you looking for this?  Covid 19: Impact On Employment And Labour Law

China’s act of spreading wrong information about the virus by denying human to human transmission despite proof of 2000 medical staff contracting the virus[9] invokes violation under Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001. Under Art.6(2) of the IHR China was obligated to provide timely, accurate  information to WHO but China failed to do so by evading WHO’s questions in late January, thereby violating its international obligations. Art.7 was also flouted when evidence regarding an event which could possibly constitute a PHEIC was not brought to the notice of the WHO and neither was all public health information provided.

Reliance can also be placed on Art.18 of the VCLT, 1969[10] which lays obligation under international law not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty. China has inadvertently defeated the purpose of ‘attainment of highest possible level of health’[11] of the WHO.

Art. 7 of the Rome Statute, 1998[12] stipulating punishment for ‘crimes against humanity’ can also be claimed for deliberately spreading the deadly coronavirus. The responsibility of China is to provide full reparation for the injury caused by its act under Art.31 of the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001.

Thus, a plethora of International Treaties and Conventions have been violated by China.

CONCLUSION

It’s been almost 9 months since the pandemic spread worldwide. It has claimed numerous lives, separated people from their families, and left migrant workers and poor people without any means for their living. It has induced high levels of risk for doctors, public servants and other workers. All this due to a virus that was allegedly created in one country? The government of India should take necessary steps to ensure that China, who either started this warfare or spread this deliberately by withholding information pay for their deeds and ensure

svasti prajabhyah: pari-palayantham

nyayeana margena mahim maheesah:

go-brahmanebhya: shubamasthu nityam

lokah: samasthah: sukhino bhavanthu

SUGGESTIONS

Are you looking for this?  Litigation and Virtual Courts: Prospects and Challenges

It is not disputed that proof against China is negligent at this point and it is highly unlikely we would ever get concrete proof against it and thus, India should proceed towards taking its own countermeasures against China as an act of rebellion for the deliberate spread of the disease by delaying information.

Art.43 of IHR allows measures to be taken to combat the novel disease. In furtherance of the same, Ministry of Commerce and Industry under the framework of Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) read with Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 can independently impose economic and trade sanctions on China. Chinese companies rely heavily on Indian markets and if deterrent sanctions are imposed against China, India can show its dissent as well as move towards being a self-sufficient country.


[1] People’s daily, China (@PD China), TWITTER ( Jan 7, 2018, 1:04 PM), https://twitter.com/pdchina/status/949907021851013120?lang=en

[2]McKie, Robin , Scientists trace 2002 Sars virus to colony of cave-dwelling bats in China, THE GUARDIAN,

(Dec 10, 2017), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/10/sars-virus-bats-china-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome.

[3]Ross Ibetsson, The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus, DAILYMAIL, ( Feb 16 ,2020, 13:22PM), https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8009669/Did-coronavirus-originate-Chinese-government-laboratory.html

[4] International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian

Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 287, , https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36d2.html

[5]UN General Assembly, Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of

Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, (Dec 16, 1971), resolution 2826 (XXVI), https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201015/volume-1015-I-14860-English.pdf

[6]UN General Assembly, United Declaration of Human Rights(UDHR), 10th Dec 1948, General Assembly

Resolution 217-A,  www.un.org

[7] UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 16th Dec 1996,

General Assembly Resolution 2200-A, www.un.org

[8] Ukraine v. Russia Federation, 2017 I.C.J Reports (Apr.19).

[9] Sarah boseley, More than 1700 health workers infected by corona virus, THE GUARDIAN, (Feb 14, 2020, 18:03GMT),https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/14/more-than-1700-health-workers-infected-by-coronavirus-in-china

[10]United Nations, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331, https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3a10.html

[11] WHO Constitution, Art. 1.

[12] UN General Assembly, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010), 17 July 1998, ISBN No. 92-9227-227-6, https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3a84.html


[cite]

China’s Imputability for the Pandemic

Author

Mansi Sethiya Jain
Student - School of Excellence in Law, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University. | + More from Author
    This author does not have any more posts.
Jahnavi S.
Student - School of Excellence in Law, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University. | + More from Author
    This author does not have any more posts.

Continue Reading

Previous: Litigation and Virtual Courts: Prospects and Challenges
Next: The Shadow Pandemic: An upsurge in Domestic Violence

Note for you

Dear Reader,
Lost in words? Don’t know what to do with them? Submit your words, put in coherent manner, to us and we’ll publish it in our journal.
Thank you!

Newsletter Subscription

Loading

Easy Surfing

  • Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) (2)
  • Children and Law (4)
  • Company Law (2)
  • Constitutional Law (17)
  • Consumer Law (1)
  • Covid and Law (10)
  • Criminal Law (10)
  • Economic Law (1)
  • Environmental Law (10)
  • Human Rights (9)
  • Intellectual Property Rights (7)
  • International Law (4)
  • Journal (39)
  • Labour Law (2)
  • Law of Evidence (2)
  • Law of Taxation (1)
  • Legal News (5)
  • Sports Law (2)
  • Technology and Law (12)
  • Torts (1)
  • Vol 1 Issue 1 (19)
  • Vol 1 Issue 2 (20)
  • Vol 1 Issue 3 (Special Issue) (10)
  • Volume 2 Issue 1 (6)
  • Volume 2 Issue 2 (7)
  • Volume 2 Issue 3 (3)
  • Volume 3 (1)
  • Volume 3 Issue 1 (5)
  • Volume 3 Issue 2 (1)
  • Women and Law (7)

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Copyright of Ex Gratia Law Journal © All rights reserved. DarkNews by AF themes.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.